Question 1 · 352 words written
What are the administrative and ethical issues involved in the above situation? 2. What are the options available to you in the above situation? 3. Discuss the merits and demerits of each option and explain your chosen course of action along with reasons.
Opening
The given case represents the issue of Sabarimala temple where women were not allowed to enter the temple due to religious beliefs of people.
Body · points and prose
- Administrative issues involved
a) To not interfere in the daily lifes and customs of people
b) To ensure law and order prevails in the country
c) To ensure justice prevails in the society
d) promoting welfare of all communities
Ethical issues involved
a) violation of gender equality due to religious Beliefs
b) discrimination and apathy towards
one section c) violation of UN Human rights of treating everybody equally. d) violation of Right to equality under article 14 of constitution.
- Options available to me
| Option 1 | Merit | Demerit |
|---|---|---|
| Don't allow women to enter | - ensure law and Order |
- promote Secularism by not interfering
- Religious belief not hurt | - against Right to equality
- against Rawlsian Justice
- against Kant's categorical imperative |
| Option 2 | Merit | Demerit |
|---|---|---|
| Give permission to enter | - uphold women's rights |
- set an example for Gender Empowerment | - Issue of lynching
- violation of modesty of women
- hurting Religious Sentiments |
| Option 3 | Merit | Demerit |
|---|---|---|
| Provide protection to women and I will enter the temple along with women | - uphold woman right |
- promote Gender equality
- Lead by example | - there can be boycott of administration
- action against me later |
(3) I will chose Option 3 due to -
a) Nari shakti and Gender Equality needs to be upheld.
b) As a DM, it is my duty to bring social change in society.
c) If State doesn't advance interest of the weak then it can't promote Social contract (Hobbes)
d) It is a matter to change the heart of people.
Close · a source
In Sabrimala Judgement, Supreme Court said that Customary Morality cannot overlook constitutional Morality and therefore there is a need to promote and take such action.