Komal PuniaAIR 6 · CSE 2024 · 301 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
The case involves displeasing seniors culminating into transfer orders in order to save jobs of my staff.
Body · points and prose
- Administrative issues involved
- loss of livelihood of staff members
- Efficiency management in dept. by outsourcing work.
- Cost cutting measures negatively affecting employees.
- Indifference of department seniors to grievance of staff losing job.
- Transfer orders - unjustified.
Ethical issues
- efficient service delivery vs job loss → by outsourcing work → of staff member
↳ (2) Inhumane face of administration indifferent to employee's issues. ↳ (3) Staff not performing their work efficiently though taking salary out of public resources. ↳ (4) Unethical & unprofessional behaviour of head of dept. by issuing transfer & disciplinary proceedings. ↳ (5) Unacceptance of junior's request and rigid hierarchical administrative structure.
- Justification on morality of writing to minister → In favour ↳ (1) saving livelihoods and sustenary of staff's families. ↳ (2) Compassionate and empathetic behaviour towards staff.
↳ 3 tried convincing head, but he was least concerned with people's grievance.
↳ 4 Humanitarian duty to help others.
Overall, I think, drastic measures like cutting from job is not the way forward.
& for available options
- My response would be - ↳ first, sincerely apologizing senior if he got offended. ↳ second, won't accept disciplinary proceedings and will present my case honestly.
(3) Making senior aware of grievance of staff and emotional appeal to them.
(4) Alternate solutions like phasewise downsizing and alternate employment opportunities to young recruits.
(5) Ensuring staff work efficiently → by training, skilling and upskilling
Close · a quotation
↓ will reduce need of downsizing.
"Minimum government maximum governance is ideal but means to achieve it should not be drastic as in above case.
"In process of attaining our goal, our means should be as fair as our ideal" - Rajendra Prasad.