AIR 40 · CSE 2025 · GS4 · 57 pages

Diksha Rai: GS4 answer copy

19 answers by Diksha Rai, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

  1. Q1What are the administrative and ethical issues involved in the above situation? 2. What are the options available to you in the above situation? 3. Discuss the merits and demerits of each option and explain your chosen course of action along with reasons.
  2. Q1(case study 3)It was Assembly election times, and you were deputed to a constituency on election duty where one of your responsibilities was to monitor candidates' campaign expenses and supervise the campaigns' videography. As you take charge and start working, you realise the challenge you have got into. Two of the candidates had a criminal background, and the whole contest was more or less between these two only. As the campaigns picked pace, you noticed that both the candidates indulged in inciting the voters on caste and religious grounds. Further, they were doling out monetary inducements in blatant violation of the election code of conduct. You had all of it on record, thanks to your videographer. You decided to warn them before taking any strict action, so you called them and confronted them with the evidence. Much to your relief, they quietly accepted the mistake and promised to comply with the codes. Two days after the meeting, you get the news that one of your videographers was severely beaten by the goons of one of the candidates. And the beating of the videographer was meant as a warning to you. Further, the same evening you get a call threatening you with dire consequences if you interfere with the campaigns. You realise that your decisions are proving to be dangerous for the people working with you. You didn't feel good about endangering the safety of your staff. 1. What are the issues involved in the above case? 2. Is it ethically justified to be devoted to duty at the cost of the personal safety of the staff? Discuss. 3. How will you go about doing your election duties without compromising the safety of your staff? Explain.20 marks
  3. Q1(case study 4)A smart city project is underway, and you have been appointed Head of Procurement. Before this assignment, you held a similar role in a major public sector undertaking (PSU), where you earned a reputation for your tender drafting and vendor management skills. Given the smart city project’s scale and significant procurement requirements, you seemed the perfect fit to lead the procurement section. A month ago, your section invited tenders for building supplies. Among the applicants was Mr. Sharma, a supplier you knew from your previous role at the PSU. Mr. Sharma lived in your neighbourhood, and your spouses were friends. Despite this personal connection, you have always maintained strict professional boundaries. Upon scrutinising all the tenders, your section found Mr. Sharma’s terms the most competitive, so the tender was awarded to him. However, once the decision was made public, another vendor, Mr Patel, accused you of colluding with Mr Sharma due to your previous relationship. Mr. Patel filed a formal complaint with the Department Seniors, providing evidence of your prior association with Mr. Sharma. As a result, an enquiry was initiated, and you were placed on compulsory leave pending its outcome. This situation left you questioning where you might have gone wrong despite your efforts to maintain professionalism. 1. Do you think the above case involves a conflict of interest or there are more issues? Explain. 2. Keeping the above case in perspective, discuss the relevance of impartiality and non-partisanship as professional value. 3. In hindsight, how do you think you could have avoided the above unpleasant situation.20 marks
  4. Q1(case study 5)You have recently joined the Statistical Department of the State as Deputy Head of Records. Your duties involved supervising the timely inflow of data, scrutinising the data source and ensuring data entry and updating. You had a staff of 32 to manage, and it was a mixed bag; some were young recruits, some were in the department for some time, and some were on the verge of retirement. Overall, the Staff was not very efficient, but somehow they managed their jobs. In one of the meetings, the Head of the Department mentioned outsourcing of jobs of your staff as a cost-cutting measure. But there were no serious deliberations, so you didn't think much of it. But yesterday, you received an official order stating that your department tasks will be outsourced and your Staff will be downsized. You had no problems with outsourcing, but you did not favour downsizing, as it would lead to people losing their jobs. You sought a meeting with your Head to discuss the ramifications of the new order, specifically the downsizing part. Your Head was very emphatic about the whole process and seemed to be least concerned with people losing their livelihood. Disappointed, you got back to your office thinking of ways of saving your staff's jobs. In utter desperation, you wrote to the concerned Minister, marking a copy to your Head and the Chief Secretary. The Minister sympathetically received the note, and he assured some positive action. But your Head was not happy about you going above without his consent. He immediately orders your transfer and starts disciplinary proceedings for non-compliance with the office order. 1. Discuss the administrative and ethical issues involved in the above case. 2. Do you think it was morally right on your part to write to the minister? Justify 3. How will you respond to the action initiated against you? Discuss the available options and justify your selected course of action.20 marks
  5. Q2What are the administrative and ethical issues involved in the above situation? 2. What are the options available to you in the above situation? 3. Discuss the merits and demerits of each option and explain your chosen course of action along with reasons.
  6. Q2(b)A. While traditional ethics has focussed on notions of justice, fair allocation and obligations, ethics of care emphasise maintaining connectedness and promoting care. Which of the above two ethical perspectives is more suitable for guiding ethical decision making in the context of public services. Explain your position with suitable examples. (150 words, 10 marks) B. What does the term "quality" mean in service delivery. What are the components of service quality and indicate ways and means for ensuring total quality in terms of efficiency, economy and effectiveness?10 marks
  7. Q3What are the administrative and ethical issues involved in the above situation? 2. What are the options available to you in the above situation? 3. Discuss the merits and demerits of each option and explain your chosen course of action along with reasons.20 marks
  8. Q6Given below are three quotations of philosophers. What do each of the quotations convey to you in the present context? A. "To feel for others, and little for ourselves; to restrain our selfish, and exercise our benevolent affections, constitutes the perfection of human nature." Adam Smith (150 words, 10 marks) B. "Virtue lies in our power, and so does vice; because where it is in our power to act, it is also in our power not to act." Aristotle (150 words, 10 marks) C. "I know that I am intelligent, because I know that I know nothing." Socrates10 marks
  9. Q6(case study 1)You are the Compliance Officer at GreenTech Industries, a company that manufactures eco-friendly products and believes in making positive environmental impacts. Your primary responsibility is to ensure that the company adheres to environmental laws and ethical standards. The Company recently developed a new product that promises significant ecological benefits but involves a manufacturing process that produces hazardous waste. During an internal audit, you discover that the hazardous waste from the new product's manufacturing process is being disposed of in a manner that technically meets legal standards but raises serious ethical concerns. While compliant with current laws, the disposal method poses potential risks to a local community's health and the environment in the long term. Legally, GreenTech Industries is not violating any regulations. The waste disposal method is within the permissible limits set by environmental laws. However, ethically, you are aware that this method could significantly harm the local community and ecosystem. You were left wondering, on the one hand, the Company was legally correct, but on the other, it was hypocritical about its avowed values of positively impacting the environment. As a conscientious professional, you are serious about taking action, but the challenge is its whats and hows. 1. What are the ethical issues and dilemmas that confronts you in the above case? 2. Discuss the available options along with its merits and demerits. 3. What will be your chosen course of action? Why20 marks
  10. Q6(case study 2)केस स्टडी 2: आप एक ग्रामीण जिले के जिला कलेक्टर हैं जहां पारंपरिक सामाजिक रीति-रिवाज और धार्मिक प्रथाएं दैनिक जीवन को दृढ़ता से प्रभावित करती हैं। हाल ही में, एक स्थानीय मंदिर और उसकी कुछ धार्मिक अनुष्ठानों और स्थानों से महिलाओं को बाहर रखने की लंबे समय से चली आ रही परंपरा से जुड़ा एक मामला सामने आया है। लैंगिक समानता का नैतिक तर्क समुदाय की धार्मिक भावनाओं से टकराता है। मंदिर के अधिकारियों का मानना है कि रीति-रिवाजों में बदलाव करने से उनकी पवित्र परंपराएं अपवित्र हो जाएंगी। इस बीच, प्रवेश की मांग कर रही महिलाएं इसे अपने अधिकारों के लिए नैतिक और कानूनी लड़ाई के रूप में देखती हैं। एक जिला कलेक्टर के रूप में आप एक अनिश्चित दुविधा में थे, एक ओर एक प्रगतिशील अधिकारी होने के नाते आप जानते थे कि क्या करना सही है, लेकिन दूसरी ओर एक प्रशासनिक पेशेवर के रूप में आप अपने हाथों से धार्मिक स्वर में अशांति नहीं चाहते थे। 1. उपरोक्त परिस्थिति में कौन-कौन से प्रशासनिक और नैतिक मुद्दे शामिल हैं? 2. उपरोक्त परिस्थिति में आपके पास क्या-क्या विकल्प उपलब्ध हैं? 3. प्रत्येक विकल्प के गुण और दोषों पर चर्चा करें और कारणों सहित अपने द्वारा चुनी हुई कार्रवाई की व्याख्या करें। (250 शब्द, 20 अंक)20 marks

The answers

Question 1 · 445 words written

What are the administrative and ethical issues involved in the above situation? 2. What are the options available to you in the above situation? 3. Discuss the merits and demerits of each option and explain your chosen course of action along with reasons.

Opening · a constitutional or legal provision

The given case study highlights the contention between the fundamental right to equality (Article 14) and Right to Freedom of religion (Article 25) as guaranteed by the constitution.

Body · points and prose

Diagram
- Stakeholders - Temple authorities - The Religious community - Protesting Women - Me (District Collector) - State - Society at large

1) Ethical Issues involved

  1. Right to equality of women.
  2. Right to freely practice one's religion.
  3. Right to religious conscience
  4. Traditional values vs constitutional values.
  5. Profesional moral ethics vs Public duties

Administrative issues involved

  1. Balancing demands of contending groups
  2. Ensuring law and order
  3. upholding constitutional values & profesional values
  4. Protecting enforcement of fundamental rights of citizens.

2) Options available to me

Option A: Persuade the group of young women in favour of temple authorities

MeritsDemerits
→ Adverse Law and order preempted→ against Rights of women to access the temple
→ Right to Religion upheld→ againt my personal values
→ Not a sustainable solution.

Option B: Allow the women to access the temple and participate in rituals

MeritsDemerits
- Constitutional values upheld- Potential law & order problem
- Gender equality upheld.- May lead to protest by section of the religious communities
- safety of the women may get compromised

Option C : Persuading the two groups to reach a common ground through dialogue

MeritsDemerits
- Social Capital protected- The groups may not agree due to rigid stance
- no law & order issue
- profenional & personal values balanced

3) My chosen course of Action I will chose option c.

3.1) I will call for a meeting among representatives of both groups. 3.2) I will try to persuade the temple authorities by explaining them how religion cannot be rigid and exclusionary. 3.3) I will take the help of SC judgement in Sabrimala case and Shani Shignapur Incident to further strengthen the arguments. 3.4) If I am not able to reach conciliation between the two groups, I will ask for suggestion from seniors due to conflict between equally important fundamental rights. 3.5) I will ensure police protection to the women who want to exercise their right to religion and access to public place. 3.6) further I will increase police presence and activate human intelligence to thwart any attempt to harm public order. 3.7) Religious customs and traditions are social heritage which needs to be protected. However it must not be exclusionary and reactionary, rather should evolve with evolving ethics, morality and values.

Close · no separate close

None written.