Question 1 · 445 words written
What are the administrative and ethical issues involved in the above situation? 2. What are the options available to you in the above situation? 3. Discuss the merits and demerits of each option and explain your chosen course of action along with reasons.
Opening · a constitutional or legal provision
The given case study highlights the contention between the fundamental right to equality (Article 14) and Right to Freedom of religion (Article 25) as guaranteed by the constitution.
Body · points and prose
1) Ethical Issues involved
- Right to equality of women.
- Right to freely practice one's religion.
- Right to religious conscience
- Traditional values vs constitutional values.
- Profesional moral ethics vs Public duties
Administrative issues involved
- Balancing demands of contending groups
- Ensuring law and order
- upholding constitutional values & profesional values
- Protecting enforcement of fundamental rights of citizens.
2) Options available to me
Option A: Persuade the group of young women in favour of temple authorities
| Merits | Demerits |
|---|---|
| → Adverse Law and order preempted | → against Rights of women to access the temple |
| → Right to Religion upheld | → againt my personal values |
| → Not a sustainable solution. |
Option B: Allow the women to access the temple and participate in rituals
| Merits | Demerits |
|---|---|
| - Constitutional values upheld | - Potential law & order problem |
| - Gender equality upheld. | - May lead to protest by section of the religious communities |
| - safety of the women may get compromised |
Option C : Persuading the two groups to reach a common ground through dialogue
| Merits | Demerits |
|---|---|
| - Social Capital protected | - The groups may not agree due to rigid stance |
| - no law & order issue | |
| - profenional & personal values balanced |
3) My chosen course of Action I will chose option c.
3.1) I will call for a meeting among representatives of both groups. 3.2) I will try to persuade the temple authorities by explaining them how religion cannot be rigid and exclusionary. 3.3) I will take the help of SC judgement in Sabrimala case and Shani Shignapur Incident to further strengthen the arguments. 3.4) If I am not able to reach conciliation between the two groups, I will ask for suggestion from seniors due to conflict between equally important fundamental rights. 3.5) I will ensure police protection to the women who want to exercise their right to religion and access to public place. 3.6) further I will increase police presence and activate human intelligence to thwart any attempt to harm public order. 3.7) Religious customs and traditions are social heritage which needs to be protected. However it must not be exclusionary and reactionary, rather should evolve with evolving ethics, morality and values.
Close · no separate close
None written.