GS4 · 20 marks · 250 words

Case Study 6: You are an IAS officer recently appointed as the Deputy Secretary in the Ministry of Rural Development. Your responsibilities include overseeing the implementation of various rural development schemes and ensuring their efficient execution. During an audit of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) funds, you discover substantial irregularities. It appears that a significant portion of the funds allocated for rural employment projects has been siphoned off by senior officials within the ministry through fraudulent invoices and fake beneficiary lists. The funds meant for the rural poor have been diverted to personal accounts. You are faced with an ethical dilemma. Reporting this corruption could lead to severe repercussions for you as the implicated senior officials are politically influential and have strong connections. You have also received subtle threats implying that your career progression could be jeopardised if you proceed with the disclosure. On the other hand, ignoring the corruption would mean perpetuating a cycle of exploitation and depriving the rural poor of their rightful benefits. 1. What are the ethical issues involved in the above case? 2. What are the options available to you? 3. Identify and explain your chosen course of action after evaluating the merits and demerits of each option.

Answered by 3 toppers · CSE 2022–2025

Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.

How toppers approached it

From all 3 answers · about 370 words · 67% drew a diagram.

Opening

  • No separate opening2 of 3
  • A figure1 of 3

Body

  • Points and prose3 of 3

Close

  • No separate close3 of 3

The toppers’ answers

Divyank GuptaAIR 21 · CSE 2024 · 367 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening · a figure

The Recent CAG report highlight 7.5 lakh fake beneficiaries in the MGNREGA list highlighting significant corruption in the administration.

Body · points and prose

  1. Ethical issues involved

a) corruption by senior officials of the Ministry

b) lack of auditing in the internal setup

c) threats from officers highlight Banality of evil (Hannah Arendt)

d) injustice to people in form of erosion of wealth and misutilisation of public funds

e) there is issue of inequality due to this.

2 & 3 options available

MeritDemerit
Option 1
let go of
the issue- No harm from threat
  • this is common | - hurts economy
  • Moral turpitude
  • against Kant's categorical Imperative | | Option 2 Leak it to the Media | - unfolding the corruption
  • people who are culprit will be punished | - threat to my image and life
  • Not address Main Issue. |
OptionsMeritDemerit
- do internal inquiry and find all culprit and pass it to Cabinet Secretary- issue will be handled better
  • internal enquiry
  • I will do my duty | - Case may be sidelined
  • there may be corruption upto top level |
Course of ActionJustification
  1. I will choose option 3 where internal enquiry and detailed report will be made | → upholding the transparency and accountability

  2. After that I will transfer that file to Cabinet secretary requesting him to act | → ensuring rules and code of conduct are followed

  3. If he acts then good | → giving time for course of action

  4. If not then I will become the whistleblower and leak it by sticking to higher values. | → I will put my interest aside as I am here to serve people → upholding justice, fairness and objectivity

Close

Times like these call for courage of conviction and will power to act. I will take inspiration from Ashok Khemka & Narhari Parikh to show these values in these times.

More on Corruption

The challenge of corruption: its causes, forms and control, whistleblowing, and the ethics of tolerating it.

All GS4 questions on Corruption