Ganesh Kumar BaskarAIR 7 · CSE 2019 · 176 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening · a definition
The question refers to the doctrine of double effect which says an action done for positive consequences is ethical even if there are negative side effects.
Body · points and prose
Arguments in favour
As per theory of utilitarianism, if the bad results are less than the impact of good end, then it is ethical.
As per Machiavellian ethics, ends justify means and other negative side effects.
Example - A doctor giving painkillers to a cancer patient knows that there are side effects but it also makes the life of cancer patient bearable.
Arguments Against
Deontological ethics argue that Kant's categorical imperative requires that every action should be ethical. It would be unethical if it is against conscience (will) even if it leads to good ends.
Example: A policeman who does a fake encounter of a dreaded criminal will have a positive end. But there is a side effect of having broken the law and principle of natural justice. Hence it is unethical.
Close · a summary
Hence doctrine of double effect is valid based on the kind of side effect.