Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 128 words written
Opening
The debate of teleology vs consequentialism relates the above statement.
Morally permissible notion is individual dependent. If a person in complete knowledge in pursuit of good end like Demonetisation or ending reservations but is aware of bad results like economic slowdown or deterioration of SC/ST, it is morally permissible only if -
Body · points and prose
- decision is pragmatic
- every stakeholders are refered
- chances of sucess is checked.
Close · a summary
eg- failure of heart surgery chances are 99% leading to immediate death, but without surgery, person can live 2yrs → then immoral to do surgery.
Thus, pragmatism is core to decide the morality of such acts. But when cases are social personal in nature like career options, then such decisions are morally permissible as it is only affecting the concerned person.