AIR 227 · CSE 2016 · Sociology I · 60 pages

Priyadarshini: Sociology I answer copy

23 answers by Priyadarshini, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

  1. Q1(a)Idiographic and nomothetic approach12.5 marks
  2. Q1(c)Bureaucracy and Rational Action12.5 marks
  3. Q1(d)Analyze Durkheim's concept of "Moral Individualism"12.5 marks
  4. Q5(c)Social composition and policies for informal sector12.5 marks
  5. Q5(d)Critically evaluate the concept of "elite exclusion".12.5 marks

The answers

Question 1(a) · 12.5 marks · 195 words written

Idiographic and nomothetic approach

Opening

Idiographic and nomothetic approach are two different methods of data analysis often to draw a distinction between history and sociology.

Body · continuous prose

Idiographic approach rests on the deductive logic of drawing the particular from empirical generalisations. Thus a particular social fact can be drawn from a larger context to behave or function in a similar pattern For instance, the correlation between suicide and regulation or integration, strong in the late 19th and early 20th century, would have relevance for the contemporary context as well.

The Nomothetic approach on the other hand is based on inductive logic of forming general laws for the purpose of grand theorisation. Often scientific analysis tends to move in these directions. Thus a particular aspect of human social life if shows strong correlations with another aspect (variable), the relationship can be inferred to be strong across time and space. This leads to theoretical propositions. For example, functionalism rests on grand postulates of organic analogy, the functionality of existing social practices and social order as theoretical generalisation.

Close · a summary

Often Sociological theorisation tends to move towards empirical generalisations from the particular. This distinguishes it from history, which is more contextual and unique to the time-space matrix.