AIR 9 · CSE 2023 · GS2 · 56 pages

Nausheen: GS2 answer copy

19 answers by Nausheen, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

The answers

Question 1 · 10 marks · 115 words written

"Interstate border disputes, if not promptly and impartially settled, can transform into persistent issues that impede development and generate friction." Highlighting the constitutional and legal framework to resolve interstate disputes, explain why Independent India has failed to resolve inter-state border disputes.

Opening

The recent tussle between Maharashtra and Karnataka over Belgaum region shows inter-state border disputes in India.

Body · points and prose

Interstate border dispute impeding development and generating friction

→ (1) Disputes over movement within a particular state. Eg) During COVID crisis in Karnataka. → (2) Disputes over transboundary rivers. Eg) Kaveri river dispute. → (3) 'Blame games' during natural disasters. Eg) Delhi-Haryana over Yamuna floods.

Diagram
- constitutional and legal framework - Article 263 for resolving disputes through dialogue - Inter state Council - Article 262 - for creation of river boards and tribunal over rivers - Article 131 - Power of Supreme court to resolve disputes - GST council for fostering dialogue on economic issues

Reasons why Independent India has failed :

→ Appeals from the tribunals keep the dispute resolution pending. e.g) Kaveri river continues after 22 years dispute → Excessive regionalism in states. → No mechanism to enforce the adjudication of tribunals.

Close

However, events like Gujarat learning from Kerala's dashboard scheme shows cooperation between the federal units.