Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 615 words written
Opening
Thomas Hobbes had highlighted the concern that human beings are driven by self-interest. Self-interest refers to tendency of individual to undertake activities suited for himself/herself.
Body
Possibility of ethical capitalism :-
Though capitalism is based on notion of limitless wealth, maximising profit.
But individuals like Gandhiji called commerce without morality a sin.
This lays focus on the need to nurture ethical capitalism for companies.
Various advantages for corporations- (a) Builds brand image and acts as source of marketing for corporate. (eg) - Due to philanthropic capitalism of Tata, Tata's products are associated with nation. Tata Salt - Desh ka Namak (b) Ensures Utilitarian principles are followed - maximum good for greater people. (c) Develops loyalty among employees, consumers (eg) - Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has ensured employee loyalty. (d) Ensures that sustainability of business is there (eg) - Narayan Murthy undertakes ethical capitalism by Infosys Foundation
Hence, need for ethical capitalism to ensure that self-interest does not lead to greed, inequality.
(a) There are various issues involved in halting the traffic for VIP movement -
- Violates utilitarian ethics - as the time of individuals, their cost, efforts are at stake reducing maximum happiness.
- May lead to narrow ethical egoism - interest of VIP are considered morally superior over public interest.
- May deny right to life and liberty - to critically ill patients, or accident cases or patients with possible delivery and childbirth.
- Is also leading to not so efficient allocation of resources - so many officials engaged in VIP traffic management.
- Against ethics of equality of all and equality before law - presence of privileges to VIP individuals.
(b) Options available to Commissioners of Police :- A. Option A - To keep the traffic and patient waiting till VIP movement happens.
| Merit | Demerit |
|---|---|
| 1. Would ensure safety, security of VIP | 1. May lead to death for patient |
| 2. Would promote ethics of duty as police official | 2. Violates Deontological ethics as action to make them wait in not ethical |
| 3. Would lead to following of oath as police officer | 3. Violates Virtue ethics as wisdom not used |
B. Option B :- Keep arrangement for VIP traffic and make a dedicated corridor for movement of patient.
| Merit | Demerit |
|---|---|
| 1. Would have Utilitarian ethics - maximum good | 1. May lead to some more efforts by staff. |
| 2. Is consistent with Golden Mean of Aristotle | |
| 3. Ensures right to life is not taken for patient | |
| 4. Upholds virtue ethics of wisdom, justice for patient |
(c) I would proceed with Option B :- I would maintain traffic arrangements with dedicated corridor for patient. Rationale :-
- Would ensure that patient reaches hospital on time.
- Ensure that there is justice done for patient.
- Similar to green corridor of Karnataka where heart was delivered.
In this way (4) Would ensure that action is ethical and accountability to citizen is there (5) Uphold duty to VIP as well as the citizen as Official. Hence, this is the most apt action.
- It would also lead to communication to the citizens that the administration is just and transparent.
- It would promote Utilitarian ethics as maximum pleasure is ensured for the VIP as well as the citizen by the administration.
Close
Hence, there should be more prudence in blocking the traffic for VIP movement so that the rights of the citizen are not violated and at the same time, there is enough security for the VIP.