GS4 · 20 marks · 250 words

Do you think it is ethically right for a civil servant to involve faith leaders in promoting government schemes? You are the Head of an Agency, a special purpose vehicle, responsible for overseeing the last-mile delivery of essential services and sorting out bottlenecks and grievances of the citizens within your jurisdiction. The essential services included Maternal and infant health care, nutritional support to BPL families, drinking water availability, etc. Your agency employed a staff of 15 to carry out regular official operations and handle grievances. Since the agency dealt with complaints, there was an enormous amount of public dealing daily. Sometimes the agency officials had to work beyond office hours to finish the regular office work as public dealings took away most of the office hours. The employees were unhappy doing the extra bit as they were not paid any overtime. A few of them informally raised the issue with you, but you were helpless as the agency rules didn't allow any travel or overtime allowances. You tried taking up the matter with HQ but to no avail. The work stress gradually started showing up among the staff, they became irritable with the complainants, and at times they shouted at them. Besides rudeness, the staff's language became abusive, derogatory, and sometimes casteist. You could notice that there were 4 of them in particular who were getting very abusive and discriminatory while handling grievances. As the Head, you warned them, but there was no marked change in your work attitude. To compound your problem, some of the villagers, through their Sarpanch, raised the issue of rude, disrespectful, and discriminatory behavior with your HQ. The HQ immediately instructed you to take action and create a respectful and dignified workspace. (a) What are the issues involved in the above case? (b) What are the action options available to you?

Answered by 4 toppers · CSE 2023–2025

Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.

How toppers approached it

From 3 of the 4 answers · about 180 words · 33% drew a diagram.

Opening

  • No separate opening3 of 3

Body

  • Points3 of 3

Close

  • No separate close3 of 3

The toppers’ answers

NausheenAIR 9 · CSE 2023 · 180 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening · no separate opening

None written.

Body · points

(a) मामले में शामिल मुद्दे:

  1. कार्य-जीवन संतुलन और कर्मचारियों का असंतोष: ओवरटाइम और भत्तों का अभाव, जिससे तनाव बढ़ता है।
  2. सार्वजनिक सेवा वितरण में गिरावट: कर्मचारियों का चिड़चिड़ापन और शिकायतकर्ताओं के साथ बुरा व्यवहार।
  3. पेशेवर नैतिकता का अभाव: कर्मचारियों द्वारा अपमानजनक, अशिष्ट और जातिवादी भाषा का प्रयोग।
  4. प्रशासनिक विफलता: सुधारात्मक चेतावनी का असर न होना और वरिष्ठ स्तर पर समस्या का समाधान न निकलना।
  5. जवाबदेही का प्रश्न: जनता की शिकायतों के प्रति संवेदनशील न होना और संस्थागत प्रतिष्ठा को नुकसान।

(b) कार्रवाई के विकल्प:

  1. सख्त अनुशासनात्मक कार्रवाई: उन 4 कर्मचारियों को कारण बताओ नोटिस देना या निलंबित करना।
  2. आंतरिक नीति में बदलाव: कार्य समय का पुनर्निर्धारण (flexi-hours) या वैकल्पिक प्रोत्साहन (जैसे क्षतिपूर्ति अवकाश) का प्रस्ताव देना।
  3. संवेदीकरण और प्रशिक्षण: सभी कर्मचारियों के लिए व्यवहारिक प्रशिक्षण और कार्यशालाएं आयोजित करना।
  4. सिस्टम का सरलीकरण: टोकन प्रणाली या ऑनलाइन समाधान के माध्यम से सार्वजनिक भीड़ और दबाव को कम करना।
  5. मुख्यालय के साथ निरंतर संवाद: फिर से मुख्यालय को स्थिति की गंभीरता और नियमों में ढील की आवश्यकता के बारे में सूचित करना।

Close · no separate close

None written.

More on Crisis Decision Making

Deciding under time pressure with incomplete information, and the ethics of acting or waiting.

All GS4 questions on Crisis Decision Making