Jagrati AwasthiAIR 2 · CSE 2020 · 360 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening · no separate opening
None written.
Body · points
(a) Issues concern various stakeholders (i) local people (ii) I (iii) NGO (iv) larger society as plant gives energy + employment
Ethical issues are:-
(i) development of all vs displacement of few.
(ii) whether those who are relocated enjoy any benefits of the plant
(iii) rehabilitation rights of the people
(iv) Environmental impacts of plant on community
(v) Any loss of livelihood due to relocation, any cultural issues
(vi) Cost to the public exchequer due to delay in the project completion
(vii) Energy access to all and developmental activities.
(viii) Trust of the locals in the SPV as they had initially agreed. Whether they were manipulated or misinformed.
(b) Course of Action:- (i) Engage with NGO and community
- acknowledge concerns regarding relocation, environmental damage (ii) Based on these concerns, assess the Environmental Impact Assessment Report of Project.
- accomodate environmental concerns if possible
- to engage NGO and community and discuss EIA report and sustainability of project.
- Reassess the project if environmentally unsustainable. Bad environment cannot be good economics
- Identify solutions for environmental problems.
(iii) Relocation issues
- engage with local community as they had initially agreed.
- find if they were manipulated
- New concerns regarding relocation
- Rehabilitation plans should be discussed.
(iv) If consensus is reached on relocation
- ensure that the community is benefitted from the plant
- employment to locals
- Relocation is effective and smooth
(v) If consensus cannot be reached
- institutionalised engagement through SPV committees
- understand the concerns.
(vi) If concerns are genuine, may be accomodated and if required the plant may be shifted to other location. (vii) However, focus on consensus building.
- NGO has spearheaded the protest, so engage them in project implementation planning
- try to address the concerns
Close
In the end, if final consensus is reached, go ahead with project & ensure benefits to the community.
If the concerns are sincere and community is disproportionately benefited, may be shift plant to new location.
This would ensure trust and confidence of people in the government. In future active coordination can be achieved. Plant can be shifted with additional cost but trust lost is all lost.