GS4 · 20 marks · 250 words

Dr. Mehra is a senior drug developer at a leading pharmaceutical company in India, renowned for producing various medications, including lifesaving drugs critical for treating chronic and rare diseases. Since its inception, the company has emphasized the quality and affordability of its drugs. Recently, under revised government guidelines, pharmaceutical companies are required to market a finished product only after obtaining "satisfactory results" from tests on the ingredients. Additionally, they must retain a sufficient quantity of samples of both intermediate and final products to allow repeated testing or verification of a batch. Dr. Mehra's team is in the final stages of developing a new medication for a rare but life-threatening disease. This drug has shown promising results in clinical trials. However, there have been unresolved concerns about the long-term side effects of the drug, observed in a small percentage of trial subjects. Despite this, the company has not released any major drug in the past decade, leading to significant pressure from the board members to expedite the drug's release. (a) Identify the stakeholders in the above case study. (b) Discuss the ethical issues faced by Dr. Mehra. (c) Analyse the options available to Dr. Mehra in the above case. Which of these would you choose and why?

Answered by 2 toppers · CSE 2024–2025

Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.

How toppers approached it

From all 2 answers · about 420 words · 50% drew a diagram.

Opening

  • No separate opening2 of 2

Body

  • Points and prose2 of 2

Close

  • No separate close1 of 2
  • A way forward1 of 2

The toppers’ answers

More on Crisis Decision Making

Deciding under time pressure with incomplete information, and the ethics of acting or waiting.

All GS4 questions on Crisis Decision Making