Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 157 words written
Opening
The classic debate of end and means is often in conflict as utilitarian concept justifies the end goal of maximum benefit to all, while the teleological principle says upholding duty or the right mean is paramount.
Body · points and prose
The classic debate of end and means is often in conflict as utilitarian concept justifies the end goal of maximum benefit to all, while the teleological principle says upholding duty or the right mean is paramount.
End cannot justify means
- Means are what drives the end
Ex - If preparation is good, the result will come automatically
- Adequate analysis of means or following the right path → will give good & desired results in the end
Ex - If government follows fiscal prudence, outcome will impact economic growth positively
(3) The concept of Nishkam Karma in Gita mentions the same ↓ do duty → The result will come automatically (4) When the result may not be as per our need ↓ Then the concept of niyati/destiny come
There cannot be any way of acquiring the right outcome as they say "do your best, leave the rest to God" - eventually signifies the importance of means.
Close · a summary
↓ Then the concept of niyati/destiny come There cannot be any way of acquiring the right outcome as they say "do your best, leave the rest to God" - eventually signifies the importance of means.