Saumya SharmaAIR 9 · CSE 2017 · 177 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
Aristotle rightly mentioned thousands of years back that persuasion is possible only with the trinity of Ethos, logos and Pathos.
Body · continuous prose
Merely using Ethos and logos may influence the listener, but may not persuade him or her enough. For instance, a very senior advocate may make an argument on the abolition of the death penalty. Such a speaker has both ethos (due to his professional image) and logos (due to the constitutionally sound arguments he may make).
Yet, there is full possibility that his well reasoned argument fails to leave an impact on the listeners. The listeners will truly internalise his arguments and accept them when he connects with them emotionally. This emotional connection results in internalisation and imbibing of social influence.
This is why the concept of emotional intelligence is so important. A superior who is making orders can achieve internalisation only if he has the pathos.
Close
Absence of pathos results in compliance (i.e. change in behaviour without change in attitude). It is only pathos which results in change in behaviour accompanied by a change in attitude.