Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 170 words written
Do laws need to be consistent with the prevalent moral norms? Discuss with examples.
Opening · a definition
Laws are the codified rules or norms enacted by a legitimate authority, violation of which may lead to punishment. Moral norms on the other hand are principles and practices in a society / organisation for leading a moral life.
Often there are clashes between the two. Eg (a) Law against dowry although moral norms in societies are in favour of dowry.
Eg (b): LGBTQ+ community accepted by law but homosexuality still against moral norms of many societies.
If laws are consistent with moral norms, it helps in
Body · points and prose
→ Greater legitimacy of the authority enacting it → Greater acceptability among people → Co-hesion in governance due to public support.
Close · a summary
eg: Swachh Bharat was in line with moral norms of cleanliness & hence better acceptability.
eg: Sabrimala judgement was not well received by a large section as it was against moral religious beliefs.
Laws are meant to aid the moral life of people. If they are in sync, it benefits all. Although there should be room for reformative laws like Dowry abolition.