Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 147 words written
Do laws need to be consistent with the prevalent moral norms? Discuss with examples.
Opening · a definition
Laws are codified or uncodified set of binding rules to govern the behavior of citizens while morals are the standards set by society for judging right & wrong.
Body · points
Need of laws to be consistent
(1) voluntary adherence to laws in such cases eg:- no theft (2) Harmony between society & government officials (3) there is peace in society
Ex:- anti-corruption law is in sync with social norms thus people shun such tendencies
However they may not be always consistent
(1) Child marriages are illegal but accepted socially (2) Similar is the case with Untouchability.
Close · a way forward
In other circumstance there may exist case of legal but immoral :-
like marital rapes & LGBTQ Rights
Hence there are different relation between law & moral norms but they should be in sync as long as possible, but sometimes law must lead to weed out harmful social norms like gender inequality