Question 1(a) · 193 words written
AR Desai studied Indian society through the lens of contradictions. Elaborate.
Opening
Ans: AR Desai studied India from the perspective of Historical materialism. This theory gives primacy to the mode of production.
AR Desai (Mode of production)
Body · points
→ Pre Independence : capitalist mode → Pre British: corporal feudalism → After Independence: failed socialism
Lens of contradiction
He says that there is contradiction in the economic base of India. Superstructure changed but base remains the same. eg: Islamic rulers [superstructure] Jajmani system [economic Base]
The destruction of agriculture did not lead to flourishing industries and development of full fledged capitalism like in the west.
Though economic base changed significantly during the british rule but the spirit of capitalism was missing.
Indians never developed the class concious-ness and became class for itself because of the highest form of dependence.
contradiction continues even after the independence
| | | /|
/ |
decade of decade of decade of hope dispair discontent
socialism has failed in India.
criticism
- MN Srinivas: Economic exaggertion of the history.
- Ghurye: Neglects cultural role in change.
Close · a summary
Therefore AR Desai view of Indian society is based on the economic determinism providing new dimension.