AIR 43 · GS2 · 55 pages

Anjali Thakur: GS2 answer copy

15 answers by Anjali Thakur, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

The answers

Question 1 · 10 marks · 406 words written

"Interstate border disputes, if not promptly and impartially settled, can transform into persistent issues that impede development and generate friction." Highlighting the constitutional and legal framework to resolve interstate disputes, explain why Independent India has failed to resolve inter-state border disputes.

Opening

The border disputes like Belgaum, North eastern clashes etc sheds light on the issues regarding solving issue of Border disputes.

Body · points and prose

Diagram
- Map of India outline showing: - Mangarh marked between Rajasthan and Gujarat - Assam-Meghalaya border marked - Kasaragod marked between Kerala and Karnataka - Belgaum marked between Karnataka and Maharashtra - Label: fig: Interstate border disputes
  • can lead to a persistent issue
  • ① Regionalism, e.g. Northeast clash
  • ② impede development, e.g. No development bills/Act passed over territory claimed by two State
  • ③ the responsibility of disputed area is taken by noone → people suffer
    • → No rights or schemes implementation effectively
  • ④ Against social capital → constant conflicts.

constitutional framework

(1) Interstate council (Art 263) to look into common interests

(2) Water Dispute Resolution Authority (Art 262) → to solve water dispute.

(3) Art 131 - original jurisdiction of SC

(4) Art 142 - complete justice.

legal framework → Zonal council under State Reorganization Act 1956 ↓ North East integration council

why failed to solve?

(1) Rejection of recommendations → Mahajan committee on Belgaum report rejected

(2) Infrequent meetings of zonal councils and not potential use of ISC (Art 263)

(3) Regionalism & Regional aspirations are obstacle

way forward → give & take should be done (India-Bangladesh land boundary Agreement)

Intrastate disputes resolution is important for cooperative federalism.

India-Australia recently signed ECTA (Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement) to reduce trade barriers to almost over 90% of products & services.

Diagram
- People to people connection - Recently signed migration & mobility agreement. - Student diaspora for higher education - Identification of mutual qualification of service providers

Fostering long lasting trade

  1. Aim is to reduce tarrifs on 96% goods & sevices
  2. Double the trade to $50 bn by 2030

→ Mutual logistic Strategic Agreement (MLSA)

③ Service exports can increase by India by recognizing the dual qualification of Indian workers.

④ Easy migration due to migration & mobility Agreement → fostering IT industry of India.

Strategic collaboration

① maintaining a sphere of influence on Indo-Pacific and pacific island countries. eg. similar view - free & open Indo-Pacific

② Both are members of QUAD → further strengthening the ties.

③ strengthening supply chain eg. Supply chain Resilient Infrastructure (SCRI) bet among Japan-India-Australia

④ Australia is a source of strategic minerals eg. Cobalt, Lithium → India can be benefited.

Certain challenges

  1. Decoupling china is difficult ↳ heavily dependent on china for trade

  2. Geographical proximity is not there → Influence of china & US is huge e.g. AUKUS

way forward → need to tap the market of Australia for manufactured product + service

Close · a way forward

↓ collaboration in fields of education, Research etc.

The people to people ties can further enhance economic & strategic interest. This Indian diaspora is said as "Little India" in Australia.