Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 159 words written
"Methodological pluralism is a panacea that can solve all research problems." Discuss
Opening · a definition
Methodological pluralism is a method advocated by likes of Ray Pawson accordingly to whom "usage of multiple methods in cross sectional approach of Qualitative and Quantitative methods simultaneously can solve problems in sociological research by increasing objectivity".
Example → Putting the responses and conclusion of a Participant Observation research to a close ended survey.
Body · points and prose
Advantages
- Allows cross checking of results obtained from one method.
- Promotes reliability and validity in methods.
- Enables a holistic vision where macro view provides extensive coverage and micro view provides depth.
- Reduces impact of social desirability bias, investigator bias, Hawthorne effect etc.
- Reorients and improves existing hypotheses.
- Enhances reproducibility, transferability and confirmability of research.
Limitations :-
- Sampling and non sampling errors can be hindrance.
- Not possible when target population is too wide.
- Cost and time consuming.
- Require precise planning and expertise, hence prone to errors.
Close · a summary
Thus, methodological pluralism is an effective remedy but not panacea.