Sociology I · 20 marks

Make a distinction between intragenerational and intergenerational social mobility. Why social mobility studies not adequately accounted for the position of women. Comment.

Answered by 3 toppers · CSE 2018–2021

Syllabus: Stratification and Mobility: (a) Concepts- equality, inequality, hierarchy, exclusion, poverty and deprivation. (b) Theories of social stratification- Structural functionalist theory, Marxist theory, Weberian theory. (c) Dimensions – Social stratification of class, status groups, gender, ethnicity and race. (d) Social mobility- open and closed systems, types of mobility, sources and causes of mobility.

How toppers approached it

From all 3 answers · about 300 words.

Opening

  • A definition3 of 3

Body

  • Points and prose3 of 3

Close

  • No separate close2 of 3
  • A summary1 of 3

The toppers’ answers

Srushti Jayant DeshmukhAIR 5 · CSE 2018 · 297 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening · a definition

According to Pitiram Sorokin, Social Mobility is the transition of an individual or group from one social position to the other.

IntragererationalInter Generational
(•) Mobility of an individual or group within the same generation.Mobility of an individual or group across two or three generation.
(•) Downward mobility of a person as a victim of natural disaster due to destruction of house is an Eg.Upward mobility of the son of a farmer who works hard & gets educated & a job in corporate sector shows inter-generational mobility.
(•) Due to sudden & immediate changes like lottery, a poor beggar can become rich.(•) Long term changes might be required and continued efforts may take time to manifest

Social mobility studies have tried to study impact of several changes. Eg

Body · points and prose

→ Lipset hypothesis of how Industrialisation promoted social mobility. → Education as a source / growth enabler can cause social mobility specially in achievement oriented society. → economic mobility. Bourgeoisisation thesis due to savings, welfare state and thrift values.

Close

These studies did not adequately account for mobility among women. This contestation by feminist scholars

like Ann Oakley is true as they argue that women continue to be oppressed irrespective or geographical or temporal considerations.

(•) These studies fail to recognize that the public sphere continues to be dominated by men, hence workplace study is only Half the Reality.

(•) Patriarchal mindset, household division of labour continues to relegate women as second class citizens.

(•) Rather "Feminisation of Poverty" is occuring due to male urban migration, lack of property control by women, ≤5% women as Board members in corporates. pink collarisation sustains subordinate status of women.

More on Social Mobility

Open and closed systems, types of mobility, and its sources and causes.

All Sociology I questions on Social Mobility