Sociology I · 15 marks

Give a critical review of 'functional analysis of religion given by Durkheim'.

Answered by 7 toppers · CSE 2016–2017

Syllabus: Sociological Thinkers: (a) Karl Marx- Historical materialism, mode of production, alienation, class struggle. (b) Emile Durkheim- Division of labour, social fact, suicide, religion and society. (c) Max Weber- Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. (d) Talcolt Parsons- Social system, pattern variables. (e) Robert K. Merton- Latent and manifest functions, conformity and deviance, reference groups. (f) Mead - Self and identity.

How toppers approached it

From 6 of the 7 answers · about 270 words.

Opening

  • No separate opening67%
  • A definition33%

Body

  • Continuous prose50%
  • Points and prose33%
  • Points17%

Close

  • A summary67%
  • No separate close33%

The toppers’ answers

Gaurav KumarAIR 34 · CSE 2017 · 287 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening · a definition

Emile Durkheim says that religion is a body of beliefs and set of practices related to sacred things ie. things forbidden and kept apart.

His functional analysis advocates that

Body · points

(1) Religion is a knowledge giving experience and it is not concerned about salvation etc. (2) He talks about sacred and profane which is universal. (3) Religion gives social identity and distinguish outsiders from insiders.

(4) Religion regulates individualism and egoism (5) It binds people together through collective conscience and makes them part of collectivity. (6) It helps during life crisis situation by giving strength. He studies totemism of Arunta tribe and said that totem act as tangible expression of society worship promoting solidarity among them.

CRITICS (1) BRONISLAW MALINOWSKI studied tribes of new south Wales and Trobrianders islands where totemism and manaism is present respectively. He argues that in new south wales sex totemism is present uniting men opposite to women. Thus totemism is not only about society or clan worship. Durkheim is preconceived with notion that religion is society worship and dragging facts to fit into his theory rather than looking into multiple forms and functions of totemism in primitive societies. (2) RUNCIMAN says that religion is not always a collective experience as envisaged by Durkheim rather it is individual's quest for meaning. (3) PETER BERGER says that society has lost its capability to hold people together. Thus religion is not society worship rather a form of everyday experience for man. (4) RODNEY STARK advocates that religion is not only binding people together, it is dividing them as well (5) BELLAH says that American society stands unified due to rise of common sacred symbols and not religion.

Close · a summary

Thus religion can have functional, non-functional and dysfunctional roles.

More on Emile Durkheim

Division of labour, social fact, suicide, and religion and society.

All Sociology I questions on Emile Durkheim