Sociology I · 10 marks · 150 words

Examine the consequences of 'social mobility' on both the 'individual' and 'societal' levels within various societal frameworks.

Answered by 3 toppers · CSE 2024

Syllabus: Stratification and Mobility: (a) Concepts- equality, inequality, hierarchy, exclusion, poverty and deprivation. (b) Theories of social stratification- Structural functionalist theory, Marxist theory, Weberian theory. (c) Dimensions – Social stratification of class, status groups, gender, ethnicity and race. (d) Social mobility- open and closed systems, types of mobility, sources and causes of mobility.

How toppers approached it

From all 3 answers · about 190 words.

Opening

  • A definition3 of 3

Body

  • Points3 of 3

Close

  • A summary2 of 3
  • No separate close1 of 3

The toppers’ answers

Malavika G NairAIR 45 · CSE 2024 · 227 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening · a definition

Social mobility is the phenomenon which allows the horizontal or vertical movement of individuals or groups across various social strata. Social mobility may be understood in terms of the various societal frameworks.

I. Open society: Promotes social mobility

Body · points

→ e.g. Capitalist America. → Individual social mobility avenues are accentuated in such societies due to education, industrialization, urbanization etc. (Fox and Miller). Parsons, Davis and Moore etc emphasize on this aspect for functionality of society. → Group social mobility is also possible in open societies but rather less pronounced due to focus on individuals.

II. Closed Society: Societal values do not promote mobility, emphasize status quoist hierarchy e.g. Caste system India, Feudal Europe, Russia

→ Individual level: strongly discouraged and often impossible to do. However, to some extent possible eg: Ghurye talks of Sadhus and their respectable social position in terms of 'status'.

→ Societal/Group level: Dipankar Gupta says group social mobility is possible eg: Sanskritization - M.N Srinivas or by Westernization eg: Parsis in India. This is aided by political power, numerical ascendancy, domination of secular hierarchy etc. eg: SNDP movement in Kerala.

Close

However, no societies are completely open or closed in practice. The avenue of social mobility in American societies is limited by elite self recruitment, lack of access to legitimate means (Merton) etc. At the same time, revolutions and social movement can change closed societies.

More on Social Mobility

Open and closed systems, types of mobility, and its sources and causes.

All Sociology I questions on Social Mobility