Ishan BhatnagarAIR 5 · CSE 2025 · 164 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening · a definition
This statement reflects upon unethical omissions where a person does not avert a known or predictable evil.
This is because "all it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing".
Hence, Doctrine of responsibility ↓ only responsible for conscious choice having knowledge of outcome
Body · points and prose
Implications →
- Ethical culpability of turning a blind eye → nudges people to take action. eg > Jessica Lal movement
2 > Crime represents collective mindset of society. eg > sansritization of corruption.
3 > Doctrine of last opportunity → person with last opportunity to prevent a tragedy is most culpable. eg > bridge inspector failing to report structural defect.
4 > Complicity with evil is evil itself → Hannah Arendt → evil is "unreflecting" and "banal".
Hence, we should abide by Gandhijis instruction to hear no evil, speak no evil and see no evil with:
(i) Zero tolerance attitude to corruption (ii) Immediate action on any instance of sexual misconduct, abuse of power etc.
Close · a way forward
None written.