GS4 · 20 marks · 250 words

Despite his behaviour, Mr. Gupta is recognized for his exceptional work performance. He has been instrumental in implementing several successful health initiatives, significantly improving healthcare delivery in districts. His expertise and dedication have made him an indispensable asset to the department, complicating the decision to address the complaints against him. Ms. Sharma had a tough decision to make. She knew she had to be strict, but she was also worried about the workflow disruption that action against Mr. Gupta could cause. (a) What are the issues and dilemmas that confront Ms. Sharma? (b) What ethical principles should guide Ms. Sharma in addressing the harassment and bullying complaints in her department? (c) What long-term strategies should be implemented to prevent harassment and bullying in government departments? How can these strategies promote a culture of respect and inclusivity?

Answered by 2 toppers · CSE 2025

Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.

How toppers approached it

From all 2 answers · about 240 words · 100% drew a diagram.

Opening

  • No separate opening2 of 2

Body

  • Points2 of 2

Close

  • No separate close1 of 2
  • A summary1 of 2

The toppers’ answers

More on Crisis Decision Making

Deciding under time pressure with incomplete information, and the ethics of acting or waiting.

All GS4 questions on Crisis Decision Making