GS4 · 10 marks · 150 words

The bailout package offered to large financial corporations in response to global financial crisis raised important ethical questions. Discuss the ethical issues involved in giving bailout packages to financial corporations using taxpayers' money.

Answered by 4 toppers · CSE 2017–2018

Syllabus: Public/Civil service values and Ethics in Public administration: Status and problems; ethical concerns and dilemmas in government and private institutions; laws, rules, regulations and conscience as sources of ethical guidance; accountability and ethical governance; strengthening of ethical and moral values in governance; ethical issues in international relations and funding; corporate governance.

How toppers approached it

From all 4 answers · about 200 words.

Opening

  • A date or context3 of 4
  • No separate opening1 of 4

Body

  • Points2 of 4
  • Points and prose1 of 4
  • Continuous prose1 of 4

Close

  • A summary2 of 4
  • No separate close1 of 4
  • A way forward1 of 4

The toppers’ answers

Karnati Varun ReddyAIR 7 · CSE 2018 · 187 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening · a recent event

Financial corporations like AIG were given bailout package from taxpayers money by U.S.A during 2008- financial crisis. Similarly recently by Greece. While bailout packages are given to protect financial stability and provide money to investors - it does raise many ethical questions.

Body · points

(i) Giving immunity to reckless behaviour :-

by giving bailout, banks will not have incentives to be prudent in lending, financial operations.

∴ this vicious cycle continues, at the end of the day with taxpayers losing

(ii) Morality of investing hard earned taxpayer money to save "greedy" bankers, financial investment operators instead in education, health sectors.

(iii) Ethicality of the behaviour of financial institutions like Morgan Stanley to pay fat paychecks to their executive from bailout package → i.e. to the people responsible for financial crisis

(iv) Capitalist principles - demand that it is natural process of evolution, for inefficient firms to fail to be replaced by better.

Close · a summary

Therefore there is certain "moral deficit" in bailing out failed and reckless, unethical firms. They must be allowed to fail, to be replaced by better institutions. Also steps should be taken to protect interests of innocent investors.

More on Corporate Governance

Ethics in the private sector: boards and disclosure, corporate social responsibility, regulatory capture, business and society.

All GS4 questions on Corporate Governance