Raghav JhunjhunwalaAIR 4 · CSE 2025 · 239 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
MSP is announced by CCEA upon CACP recommendations; currently being 1.5(A2+FL). However, demands were raised recently to legally guarantee it at 1.5C2.
Body · points and prose
Legalization: Favour (Protect from Price shocks)
(1) will ameliorate us from (W), Rice monoculture: Assured procurement equally → agri diversification (crop blind procurement)
(2) would prevent distress sale under pressure of middlemen as farmers would be assured of MSP price.
(3) Dalwai committee: only 15-40% of final prices reach farmers (will improve after legal)
(4) Declining productivity of Agri may get even out POST diversification.
Legalization: Against
(1) Fiscal Bomb: currently, MSP subsidy ≈ ₹ 2 lakh cr. p.a. → shoot to around ≈ ₹ 10 lakh cr. p.a. (NITI, R. Chand)
(2) WTO issues: Amber Box, De-minimis support
(3) Food Inflation will spike
(4) Public Investment in Agri. would suffer upon MSP legalization → subsidies mostly benefit larger farmers (Dalwai Co.)
(5) Dependency Syndrome &
(6) Breakdown of Agri markets; futures, etc. contracts will suffer.
making system more efficient
(1) Improving MSP-support schemes (MIS, PM-AASHA, etc)
(2) From Price-based support to Income based support (Ex: PM KISAN) → benefits small farmers alike → WTO compliant support.
(3) Enhancing Public Investment in Agri → storage & cold storage (MIDH scheme, Agri-Infra Fund) → transport & marketing for better price discovery)
(4) Promoting Food Processing.
(5) Crop Insurance to deal with exigencies. (Fasal Bima)
Close · a summary
Legalizing MSP is not the ultimate panacea but requires more comprehensive approach.