GS2 · 15 marks · 250 words
The Constitution of India provides several rights that empower the individual, yet it balances these freedoms with reasonable restrictions in the larger public interest. Discuss how constitutional restrictions on fundamental rights strike a fine balance between individual interests and societal interests. Also, mention the principles that are considered in evaluating the reasonableness of restrictions with reference case laws.
Answered by 1 topper · CSE 2024
Syllabus: Indian Constitution—historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure.
How toppers approached it
From the one answer · about 290 words.
Opening
- A constitutional or legal provision1 of 1
Body
- Points and prose1 of 1
Close
- A summary1 of 1
The toppers’ answers
More on Fundamental Rights
Part III rights, their scope, reasonable restrictions and enforcement.
- The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019 has introduced a new dimension to the principle of affirmative action in India. Critically examine its implications for the broader goal of social justice.11 answers
- How does the Supreme Court's recent decision on Aligarh Muslim University's minority status affect the interpretation of Article 30 of the Indian Constitution?11 answers
- Discuss the role of the judiciary in navigating the tension between the right to religion and constitutional morality in India in recent times. Refer to relevant case laws.10 answers
- The evolving relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy has been a dynamic feature of India's constitutional journey, often necessitating judicial interventions and constitutional amendments. Discuss.7 answers
- What are the constitutional provisions related to minority educational institutions in India? How have judicial pronouncements shaped the balance between the right to equality and the right to preserve minority identity in India?7 answers