GS2 · 15 marks · 250 words
Although upholding the spirit of the Constitution through judicial activism is noble in its intent, in practice it runs the risk of undermining the delicate balance of power that the Constitution sought to achieve. Critically examine.
Answered by 1 topper
Syllabus: Separation of powers between various organs dispute redressal mechanisms and institutions.
How toppers approached it
From the one answer · about 230 words.
Opening
- A date or context1 of 1
Body
- Points1 of 1
Close
- A way forward1 of 1
The toppers’ answers
More on Separation of Powers
Friction and redressal between the legislature, executive and judiciary.
- The rule of law and judicial review are interdependent, as one cannot truly exist without the other. In this context can judicial review be considered the most important aspect among those that constitute the basic structure of the Constitution?10 answers
- The principle of 'Separation of Powers' is a key feature of the American Constitution. In this context, compare how the Indian Constitution's functional separation of powers distinguishes itself from the US system. What are the advantages of a check and balance system over a rigid Separation of Powers?10 answers
- In the context of persistent legislative dysfunction in India, analyze the evolving role of judicial activism in shaping public policy and governance. Using examples from landmark court cases, evaluate the effectiveness of judicial interventions in addressing governance gaps and safeguarding citizens' rights.9 answers
- What is the significance of the Leader of Opposition in the Indian parliamentary system? How does the role of the opposition contribute to the checks and balances in a democracy?7 answers
- "Supremacy of the constitution requires all ordinary laws to conform to the constitutional law." Discuss the statement with reference to judicial review in India.5 answers