A topper · GS2 · 54 pages

Sapna Chandel: GS2 answer copy

20 answers by Sapna Chandel, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

The answers

Question 1 · 10 marks · 156 words written

Why does the Constitution not provide for a conclusive say to the State Legislative Assemblies in the creation, bifurcation, or dissolution of a State?

Opening

India is the indestructible union of destructible states, centre with power to determine state's future.

Body · points

Constitution provision related to above:-

(1) Article 2 and 3 provides parliament with power to create, bifurcate or dissolve states.

(2) President has to only refer it to state, their suggestions/recommendations non binding.

State legislatures, with inconclusive say

(1) Indian federalism → quasi-federal based on Canadian federation, here union devolves power to states unlike in USA.

(2) Protect unity & integrity of the country as enshrined in preamble, else it can → bifurcation of states of multiple identities.

(3) The State reorganisation commission also upheld that despite linguistic diversity → integrity paramount.

(4) To ensure economic viability of the states. [eg]:- Post bifurcation Jharkhand & Chattisgarh using resources viably.

(5) To limit any future division of India in name of identity politics.

Close

[eg]- Khalistan Movement in Punjab.

India united is strength, india divided is an opportunity for external forces.