Ashi SharmaAIR 12 · CSE 2024 · 172 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening · a date or context
The old world order set against the backdrop of world war 2 and the consequent cold war politics emphasised on globalisation, but now in a multi polar world we are going towards minilaterism.
Body · points and prose
Losing significance of NAM, G77, Davos
Arguments in favour.
① decreasing western capitalist hegemony and rise of multipolar world order has eroded credibility of Davos.
② The value of non-alignment is not pragmatic and USSR is no longer a threat to USA. reducing relevance of NAM.
③ The global south under G77 is a diverse group with often competing interests
④ Small organisations like QUAD, I2U2, AUKUS 4.1 have specialised focuses 4.2 easier to forge consensus 4.3 comprise of like minded countries
Arguments Against ① fragmentation of global order by multilateral organisations will increase difficulties in addressing global problems like war, terrorism, climate change etc.
② NAM, G77 can boost South-South solidarity + create equitable world order.
⑤ Davos → multistakeholder forum
Close · a way forward
↳ policy innovations
The need of the hour is to reform global institutions and empower multilateral institutions.