Manuj JindalAIR 53 · CSE 2016 · 306 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
This case presents a situation of ensuring security of the personnel in police force while also balancing freedom of speech & expression of media.
It is important to note that in such operations of national security implications, media is required to act responsibly & report so that lives of personnel & operational tactics are
not compromised. My decision will be directed by media ethics & also the concern for safety of the forces & national security interest.
Options:
Body · points
(1) Act as per joint operation head advice, curtail media:
Merits (a) Motivate the forces to carry out operation. (b) Demotivate naxalites & cause them to surrender. (c) Gain public & government's accolades for me personally.
Demerits (a) Cause media to write poorly about my own decision & lead to public outory. (b) Against values of media ethics &
freedom of speech & expression as per Article 19.
(2) Call an emergency meeting of media editors, National Broadcasting Standards Authority officials & police force representatives for a joint solution.
Merits : (1) let all sides present their case, facts & reach to a middle path & agreeable solution. (2) lay out all rules & ethical code of conduct for media to ensure its compliance.
Demerits (1) Could lead to further complication & different sides may not come to agreement.
(3) Appeal to media to stop coverage of sensitive information and issue warnings in case not adhered.
Merits (a) Media will act & stop coverage.
Demerits (a) Coverage may continue & situation may escalate.
Close · a way forward
I will pursue option (2) to call a joint meeting to ensure that media editors are reminded of their duty of not endangering lives of security forces. This will invariably lead to a longer term solution of ensuring that media freedom is preserved but their duty as a 4th estate of society is also fulfilled.
How toppers approach this question, and more on its topic: open the question.