UPSC Mains 2015 · GS II · Q5 · 12.5 marks · 200 words

Resorting to ordinances has always raised concern on violation of the spirit of separation of powers doctrine. While noting the rationales justifying the power to promulgate ordinances, analyze whether the decisions of the Supreme Court on the issue have further facilitated resorting to this power. Should the power to promulgate ordinances be repealed?

हिन्दी में

अध्यादेशों का आश्रय लेने ने हमेशा ही शक्तियों के पृथक्करण सिद्धांत की भावना के उल्लंघन पर चिंता जागृत की है। अध्यादेशों को लागू करने की शक्ति के तर्काधार को नोट करते हुए विश्लेषण कीजिए कि क्या इस मुद्दे पर उच्चतम न्यायालय के विनिश्चयों ने इस शक्ति का आश्रय लेने को और सुगम बना दिया है। क्या अध्यादेशों को लागू करने की शक्ति का निरसन कर दिया जाना चाहिए?

How a topper answered the closest question

Toppers wrote this one in a test series: “Ordinance making by the executive is violative of the Principle of Separation of Power. Do you agree that the constitutional and Judicial safeguards have been successful in preventing the misuse of such powers?”

Chaitanya AwasthiAIR 37 · CSE 2022 · 236 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening · a constitutional or legal provision

A. 123 and A. 213 of the Indian Constitution empower the President and Governors to promulgate ordinances respectively. Such power is to be exercised on the aid and advise of Council of Ministers.

Ordinance is a temporary legislation to meet an exigency when both or one of the House is not in session. It is not a parallel power of legislation and has to be passed withing 6 weeks of reassembly by the Parliament/State Legislature.

Given its controversial nature, a number of safeguards have been provided:

Body · points and prose

(1) Rules of Lok Sabha mandate laying of a memo explaining the circumstances that warranted the ordinance.

Some extra point → An ordinance is subject to the same constitutional limitation as an Act of Parliament

(2) In RC Cooper Case, Supreme Court allowed Judicial review on limited grounds. (3) In Krishnakumar case, Judicial Review was extended to consider:

Close · a way forward

(A) Sufficient Cause (B) Oblique Motive

However, despite these checks, the executive practices such as "Repromulgation of Ordinances" raise serious concerns about accountability and Separation of Power. In DC Wadhwa Case, Supreme Court too criticized the above practice and called for restraint, reforms and respect of functions by each organ of government.

Reform needed to restrict the maximum limit of ordinance; all stakeholders act responsibly.

Judicial safeguardsConstitutional safeguards
(1)(1)
(2)(2)
(3)(3)

1 more topper’s answer to this question, part by part, and how they all approached it: open the question.

Toppers’ answers to other close questions

Source: UPSC, Civil Services (Main) Examination 2015, General Studies Paper II, Q5. The paper on upsc.gov.in. Themes and links to toppers’ answers are by UPSC Grade, not by UPSC.