Question 1 · 10 marks · 221 words written
Opening · a definition
Rule of law refers to the primacy of legal standards, where 'Lex is Rex' i.e. law is king, whereas judicial review refers to power of judiciary to review the constitutionality of any law.
Body · points and prose
Rule of law & Judicial Review
(1) Rule of law upholds that no person can be punished without violation of law. → Judicial review ensures that the legislative & executive wings cannot arbitrarily punish any one. Eg: striking down of sec 66 of IT Act in Shreya Singhal case.
(2) Rule of Law ensures that all persons are equal in front of the law. → Judicial Review ensures that principles of equality are upheld. Eg: disqualification of sitting MP/MLA upon conviction (Lily Thomas, 2013) (3) Judicial Review cannot exist without Rule of law, as it ensures separation of power, constitutionalism and independence of judiciary.
Importance of Judicial Review vis-a-vis Basic structure of constitution
(1) Judicial Review is the most important feature, because it is only through Article 32, 226, 13 etc. that judiciary evaluates the constitutional validity of any law and if it violates the basic structure. (2) Judicial Review's absence will lead to nullification of Basic structure doctrine, as no accountability mechanism will be present.
Close
Therefore, federalism, secularism, basic structure virtues, rule of law, also stand in an umbrella of protection provided by judicial review.