AIR 37 · CSE 2022 · GS4 · 54 pages

Chaitanya Awasthi: GS4 answer copy

19 answers by Chaitanya Awasthi, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

  1. Q1(b)Why, sometimes, it is felt that suitably modifying people's attitudes is critical for maximizing policy outcomes? Explain various tools at disposal of an administrator to change people's attitudes. (10 marks, 150 words) (b) Modern technology has the potential to not only reinforce existing social biases but also generate discriminatory outcomes. Explain with the help of suitable examples.10 marks
  2. Q33. Swacch Bharat Abhiyan
  3. Q7The onslaught of the Covid-19 Pandemic resulted in loss of many lives. Many families were left without anyone to take care of children and many parents lost their beloved children. This situation left an environment of misery. Taking this situation into consideration, the Chief minister of a state declared a scheme under which Rs 5 Lac will be provided to a family who had suffered a loss of life during the Covid-19 onslaught. Vikram Singh is a responsible district level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under the declared scheme. The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following: (a) Aadhar card of the deceased. (b) Belonging to a reserved community. (c) Family income of less than 1 lakh per annum. (d) Valid death certificate which mentions Covid as Primary cause of Death. One day, an old couple visited Vikram's office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man informed Vikram that his Son has died due to the Covid. His son was the sole breadwinner and after his demise they have been left helpless as there is no income and now he has to provide for the future of his three grandchildren. Whatever money has been left with them, they are using it to fund children's education and other expenses and are hopeful that the recently declared scheme would benefit them greatly. The Old couple fulfills all the criteria except criterion 'a' and 'd'. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life. How should Vikram Singh respond to the situation?20 marks
  4. Q10You are a Sub-Divisional magistrate of a large city, having the reputation of a very honest and upright officer. A huge hospital in your city is working day and night to ensure Emergency services are carried out because of the COVID-19 pandemic. One night, during monsoons, fire engulfed the Covid ward causing instant death of 20 patients including 10 minors. Many more were seriously injured requiring immediate medical attention. The mishap resulted in a big hue and cry, forcing the government to institute an inquiry. Your preliminary enquiry has revealed a series of anomalies. The material used for the cables was of poor quality. Despite the approved building plans permitting only one basement, an additional basement has been constructed which required more power demand causing stress on the system. This was overlooked during the periodic electrical inspections by the building inspector of the municipal corporation. In your enquiry, you noticed that the hospital has more demand of power than sanctioned by the electricity department. Apart from this you also noticed many irregularities in compliance to the fire safety guidelines. There were no proper exit routes indications and many other technical irregularities. The permission to have higher load demand and No Objection Certificate for fire safety was accorded by the previous Sub-Divisional Magistrate who is not only your senior and well known to you professionally, but also a good friend. Prima facie, the case appears to be of a widespread nexus between officials of the district administration and the hospitals. Your colleagues are putting pressure on you to go slow in the enquiry. The previous SDM happens to be a close relative of a powerful minister in the state cabinet. The previous SDM is persuading you to hush up the matter, promising you a fortune to do so. He also hinted that if this matter is not resolved at the earliest in his favour there is somebody in his office who is waiting to file a case against you under the POSH Act. (a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) What are the options available to you in this situation? (c) Explain your selected course of action.20 marks
  5. Q11A reputed Automobile company based in India developed an Electric Vehicle(EV) for the international market and started exporting the same after getting necessary approval. The company announced this achievement and also indicated that soon the product will be made available for the domestic consumers with almost same quality and safety features. Accordingly, the company got its product approved by the domestic competent authority and launched the product in the Indian market. The company could increase its market share over a period of time and earned substantial profit both domestically and internationally. However, the random sample test conducted by inspecting team found the product being sold domestically in variance with the approval obtained from the competent authority. On further investigation, it was also discovered that the automobile company was not only selling electric vehicles which were not meeting the stipulated safety standards of the country but also selling the rejected export vehicles in the domestic market. This episode adversely affected the reputation and profitability of the automobile company. (a) What action do you visualize should be taken by the competent authority against the automobile company for violating the laid down Domestic Vehicle Safety Norms and selling rejected export products in the domestic market? (b) What course of action is available with the automobile company to resolve the crisis and bring back its lost reputation? (c) Examine the ethical dilemma involved in the case.20 marks

The answers

Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 247 words written

Emotional intelligence is highly instrumental for public officials to successfully navigate the various complexities and contradictions they face in both their public and private life. Do you agree?

Opening · a definition

Emotional Intelligence is the ability to reason with one's emotions and use emotions in reasoning.

Guided by Taylor and Weber's idea on bureaucracy, it was assumed that efficiency is compromised if emotions are allowed to influence rational decisions. Thus impersonality and dehumanisation were regarded as virtues. However, this was challenged by Elton, Mayo etc through Hawthorne Studies which claimed that human relations facilitated organisational growth. This was further substantiated by Goleman to show that 80% of job's success was contingent upon Emotional Quotient.

Body · points and prose

→ Advantages of Emotional Intelligence

(1) Relationships are DNA of Governance and thus leaders are able to create friendly work environment. Productivity ↑↑

(2) Leaders with higher Emotional Quotient create better communication structure. Role Clarity ↑

Inter group conflict ↓ ← Avoid Symbols

(3) Holistic improvement of process - Collaboration ↑

Time Management ↑, Cooperation ↑, Social Capital ↑

(4) Self Awareness → Strengths → Weaknesses → Realistic Goals { Public life & Private life advantages

(5) Self Motivation → sustained effort → resilience → Demoralisation ↓

(6) Self Regulation → Controlled expressions → Objectivity

(7) Social Skills → Tolerance → Tactfulness, Sense of Humour → Sensitivity

(8) Empathy

Close · a quotation

Thus all the above advantages are instrumental in navigating challenges of public and private lines. The foundation of all ethical systems is an individual and hence emotional intelligence in private life and values reinforces positive impacts in public sphere. As Roosevelt remarked, "Noone cares how much you know, until they know how much you care."