A topper · GS4 · 66 pages

Aprit Upadhyay: GS4 answer copy

10 answers by Aprit Upadhyay, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

  1. Q11. क्या इस अध्ययन में डॉ. सिंह की भागीदारी उचित है? अपना औचित्य सिद्ध कीजिए।
  2. Q22. क्या डॉ. सिंह हितों के टकराव से जुड़े हैं? यदि हां, तो ऐसे टकराव की प्रकृति क्या है? इसका शमन कैसे किया जा सकता है।
  3. Q33. यदि उनके नाम पहले से ही शेयर नहीं होते तथा उक्त अध्ययन के संचालन के एवज में शेयर का प्रस्ताव किया गया होता तो हितों के टकराव की प्रकृति किस प्रकार अलग होती?

The answers

Question 1 · 171 words written

1. क्या इस अध्ययन में डॉ. सिंह की भागीदारी उचित है? अपना औचित्य सिद्ध कीजिए।

Opening · no separate opening

None written.

Body · points

  1. Dr. Singh's participation in this study can't be justified as:-

i) Conflict of interest: Being a shareholder he will gain if company benefits. At same time, he is required to work with neutrality in conducting trials. This situation will create a dilemma and can unduly influence his decision.

Dr. Singh definitely faces this conflict of interest. To mitigate this conflict, i) He must tell the company and move away from the participation ii) In case, he decides to continue then he must liquidate all his stock

The two can't be carried together. Hence, he must have one of his position.

However, a better justified position will be to liquidate his stocks and conduct trials as:-

i) Not much options are available to company ii) If tested successfully, it can help @ many patients suffering from MI iii) Long term interests of Dr. singh are to help his patients. This is in accordance with medical ethics. This position will cause greater happiness of greater number of people (Utilitarian view). 3. …

Close · no separate close

None written.