GS4 · 20 marks · 250 words
Upon his recent appointment as DM of a district, Naveen finds that the local MP is involved in misappropriation of MPLADS funds. The local staff and the previous DCs have turned a blind eye to this practice for their own benefit. There is a strong nexus between the MP and the local administration. The villagers are deprived of the basic amenities for which the funds were meant. (a) Identify the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) Examine the options available to Naveen and suggest the best course of action. (c) What long-term measures would you suggest to improve the situation?
Answered by 1 topper · CSE 2024
Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.
How toppers approached it
From the one answer · about 370 words · 100% drew a diagram.
Opening
- A restatement1 of 1
Body
- Points and prose1 of 1
Close
- A way forward1 of 1
The toppers’ answers
More on Utilisation of Public Funds
Stewardship of money that is not one's own: waste, diversion, and the duty to spend well.
- When people use a common resource without a coordinated plan the result is often a tragedy of the commons in which the resource is depleted. In this context, discuss the various ethical challenges arising out of utilization of Global Commons.13 answers
- As the administrator in-charge of your area, you are witness to the widespread food wastage in lavish parties as well as in restaurants and eateries, on one hand and people starving due to inability to ensure one square-meal a day, on the other. Realizing that it is not the scarcity of resources, but the habit of people that is causing paucity in availability of food, you decide that certain measures are needed to be taken in order to deal with the issue of starvation at the grassroot level. 20 Given the situation, answer the following questions: (a) Identify the ethical issues involved in this case. (b) What measures would you take to deal with wastage of food in your area? (c) What explains this co-existence of affluence and hunger in developing countries like India?12 answers
- What are the issues involved in the above case? (b) With a limited budget at your disposal, you decide to allocate funds to tackle witchcraft-related superstitions. How would you justify your decision to the community and stakeholders? (c) Given that witchcraft-related crimes were not initially reported by the BDOs, how would you address this lack of communication and ensure better reporting and transparency moving forward?11 answers
- What do you understand by Integrity Pacts? Highlight the role they can play in bringing transparency in allotment of public contracts and ensuring proper utilization of public funds in India.11 answers
- Mr. Pradeep is a senior civil servant in the central government and is involved in the budgeting department. In the course of performing his duties, he comes to know about diversion of funds earmarked for SC/ST sub-plan for other purposes. While he is not directly responsible for this aspect of the budget, he raised his concerns to the department concerned. He also learns that the minister responsible as well as senior most civil servants are aware of the practice and have given tacit approval for it. Soon thereafter, Pradeep was summoned to talk on the issue and was told that since the matter is not within his jurisdiction, he should 'keep his nose out of it'. After much soul searching, Pradeep decided to obey his supervisors by leaving the matter alone. Based on the information given, answer the following questions: 20 (a) Elaborate on the internal dissonance that Pradeep faces in the given situation. (b) On what basis can the decision of Pradeep be justified? (c) Had you been in Pradeep's place, what would have been the course of action chosen by you? Recognise the merits and demerits, if any.9 answers