You are posted as the District Magistrate in a tier-2 city. As part of routine administrative coordination, you recently conducted a performance review of key departments. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) in your district was commended for resolving a large backlog of land dispute cases and digitizing over 6,000 property records in a high-conflict zone. Her work has improved grievance redressal and reduced local litigation. However, you soon receive an internal note from the General Administration Department, asking for your remarks on a "routine" proposal to transfer the RDO to a remote sub-division. No performance concerns are cited. Informally, you learn that the RDO's strict application of land laws has led to resistance from local political leaders. Some had interests in disputed religious landholdings and were reportedly unhappy with her refusal to accommodate "community sentiments." During a recent meeting, a senior MLA remarked that officers should be "more politically aware of local dynamics." The officer has not filed a formal complaint but appears demoralized. Your senior colleagues hint that this may be a "signal" to adjust administrative behaviour. Your confidential note, due in 48 hours, will influence the transfer's fate. There is no legal bar, but tenure guidelines recommend a minimum 2-year posting, and the officer is only 10 months into the role. 1. What are the administrative and ethical issues involved in the case? 2. What would be your response in the official note, and why? 3. How can senior civil servants uphold neutrality and fairness in politically sensitive postings without inviting retaliation or appearing insubordinate?

Answered by 2 toppers · CSE 2023–2025

Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.