Mr Pradeep is a senior civil servant in the central government and is involved in the budgeting department. In the course of performing his duties he comes to know of diversion of funds earmarked for SC/ST sub-plan for other purposes. While he is not directly responsible for this aspect of the budget, he raised his concern to the department concerned. He also learns that the minister responsible as well as senior most civil servant are aware of the practice and have given tacit approval for it. Soon, thereafter Pradeep was summoned to talk on the issue and was told that since the matter is not within his jurisdiction, he should "keep his nose out of it". After much soul searching, Pradeep decided to drop his argument by leaving the matter alone. Based on the information given, answer the following questions: (a) Elaborate the ethical dilemma that Pradeep faces in the given situation. (b) On what basis can the decision of Pradeep be justified? (c) Had you been in Pradeep's place, what would have been the course of action taken by you? Recognise the merits and demerits of any.

Answered by 1 topper · CSE 2020

Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.