GS4 · 20 marks · 250 words

You are an IAS officer recently appointed as the Deputy Secretary in the Ministry of Rural Development. Your responsibilities include overseeing the implementation of various rural development schemes and ensuring their efficient execution. During an audit of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) funds, you discover substantial irregularities. It appears that a significant portion of the funds allocated for rural employment projects has been siphoned off by senior officials within the ministry through fraudulent invoices and fake beneficiary lists. The funds meant for the rural poor have been diverted to personal accounts. You are faced with an ethical dilemma. Reporting this corruption could lead to severe repercussions for you as the implicated senior officials are politically influential and have strong connections. You have also received subtle threats implying that your career progression could be jeopardised if you proceed with the disclosure. On the other hand, ignoring the corruption would mean perpetuating a cycle of exploitation and depriving the rural poor of their rightful benefits. 1. What are the ethical issues involved in the above case? 2. What are the options available to you? 3. Identify and explain your chosen course of action after evaluating the merits and demerits of each option.

Answered by 6 toppers · CSE 2024–2025

Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.

How toppers approached it

From all 6 answers · about 400 words · 67% drew a diagram.

Opening

  • No separate opening83%
  • A figure17%

Body

  • Points and prose100%

Close

  • A way forward50%
  • No separate close33%
  • A summary17%

The toppers’ answers

Komal PuniaAIR 6 · CSE 2024 · 400 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening

The case involves a classic example of corrupt officials using public funds for personal gain, jeopardising people's welfare.

Body · points and prose

Diagram
- Stakeholders - Senior officials (corrupt) - Rural poor - Me (Deputy Secretary in M/o RD) - Auditing team MGNREGA - Society at large

1) Ethical issues involved

  1. Personal gain at cost of public welfare.
  2. Corruption and forgery.
  3. Misuse of public funds and taxpayers money.
  4. Nexus between senior officials & politicians perpetuating corruption.
  5. People's rights are being compromised.
  6. Honesty is not appreciated ↳ subtle threat on exposure of corruption.
  7. Against constitutional principles of Article 39(b) & (c).
  8. Selective welfare of few prioritized over collective welfare of all.

2) Options available with merits & demerits

  1. Feign ignorance and doesn't report corruption.
MeritsDemerits
1) Personal welfare ensured.1) Public welfare duty is neglected.
2) Career progression is not compromised.2) Ignoring corruption is also being part of it.
  1. Report corruption to relevant authorities
MeritsDemerits
1) Funds will go to rightful rural public.1) Career progression jeopardised.
2) Will set a good precedent and reduce corruption.2) Complaint may be ignored due to nexus.
3) Utilitarianism approach [largest people welfare].3) Displeasing seniors above in hierarchy.
  1. Make audit report public by way of filing RTI by any NGO.
MeritsDemerits
1) Public will question seniors for their corruption.1) Disclosure of critical information - against secrecy.
2) Could minimise severe repercussions on me.2) Seniors still displeased → Personal cost.

3) My chosen course of action

Close · a way forward

My chosen course of action will first include effort of solving issue internally.

I will ask seniors not to indulge in corruption and prevent misuse of funds.

If they don't heed my requests, I will utilise internal mechanisms for exposing their corrupt practices.

If still no action is taken, I will try to involve relevant NGOs to question the auditing report.

In the long term, I will try to institutionalise transparency reforms like digitalisation, social auditing, disclosure of information freely etc., so that in future, corruption can be minimised.

Though my efforts may not be sufficient to eradicate the menace of corruption, but as SUKA JATAKA (where a parrot tries to extinguish fire by carrying water in his beak), signifies that no efforts are wasted.

More on Corruption

The challenge of corruption: its causes, forms and control, whistleblowing, and the ethics of tolerating it.

All GS4 questions on Corruption