GS4 · 10 marks · 150 words

"There is growing evidence that when it comes to moral judgment, human beings appear to be best characterised not as intuitive Deontologists or Consequentialists but as intuitive virtue theorists." Critically analyse the statement.

Answered by 3 toppers · CSE 2024–2025

Syllabus: Contributions of moral thinkers and philosophers from India and world.

How toppers approached it

From all 3 answers · about 180 words.

Opening

  • No separate opening2 of 3
  • A quotation1 of 3

Body

  • Points2 of 3
  • Points and prose1 of 3

Close

  • A quotation1 of 3
  • A summary1 of 3
  • A way forward1 of 3

The toppers’ answers

Raghav JhunjhunwalaAIR 4 · CSE 2025 · 132 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening

Consequentialists, Deontologists and virtue theorists have different dictums to determine the ethicality of any action, and sometimes may be at loggerheads.

Need for virtue theory:

I) Flaws of consequentialism

Body · points

→ Unintended consequences → Inability of humans to foresee all future situations.

Ex: Ravaging a forest to develop infrastructure.

II). Flaws of Deontology → Extreme Rule Fetish

Ex: Denying govt. welfare just because poor doesn't have documents.

Virtue Theory : Provides that in an ethical dilemma, we must depict virtues in our behavior.

Ex: Abhimanyu despite being trapped @ Chakravyuh, fought courageously.

However, it also has its challenges → merely showing virtue isn't enough. → Sometimes fails to solve the problems at hand.

Close · a summary

Ex: India's idealism & lack of pragmatism in foreign policy pre 1990s.

Thus, there are differing views to determine ethicality...

More on Ethical Theories

A named framework used as a framework: consequentialism and utilitarianism, deontology and duty, virtue ethics, care ethics, and the tensions between them.

All GS4 questions on Ethical Theories