GS4 · 25 marks · 250 words

Government has officially decided to construct a nuclear power plant in one district of a state. All the clearances have been done such as design, disaster profiling of the area, population which will be relocated, etc., and the location has been found very ideal for the plant. Since the location is in remote area which is sparsely populated, there are over 2000 population which are going to be affected in relocation. The locality has children, youths, adult men and women, aged, farmers, local traders and businessmen. They have been living happily in that remote area and with their collective efforts; largely the village has been self reliant. They are not against the plant or any developmental project but they also don't want disruption in their lifestyle, social harmony, belongingness and emotional attachment, recreation, business, and farming, which they have narrated to you on your visit to the area. Some of them have even threatened that if this happen, they will commit suicide. Suppose you are a government officer and has been given with adequate power the task to successfully relocate them, then a) What will be the order of priority to the above stakeholders while exploring various options and why? b) What are the various options available to you? c) Evaluate them and choose the most appropriate one, giving reasons.

Answered by 1 topper · CSE 2016

Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.

How toppers approached it

From the one answer · about 460 words.

Opening

  • No separate opening1 of 1

Body

  • Points1 of 1

Close

  • No separate close1 of 1

The toppers’ answers

More on Ethical Dilemmas in Government

Ethical concerns and dilemmas arising in government and private institutions, and how a conflict between two duties is resolved.

All GS4 questions on Ethical Dilemmas in Government