GS2 · 15 marks · 250 words
While India has a structured but rarely used process for the removal of judges, the UK emphasizes ministerial responsibility and in house mechanisms . Compare and evaluate these approaches in maintaining judicial accountability.
Answered by 2 toppers · CSE 2025
Syllabus: Comparison of the Indian constitutional scheme with that of other countries.
How toppers approached it
From all 2 answers · about 230 words · 50% drew a diagram.
Opening
- A definition1 of 2
- No separate opening1 of 2
Body
- Points and prose1 of 2
- Points1 of 2
Close
- A summary1 of 2
- A way forward1 of 2
The toppers’ answers
More on Comparative Constitutions
The Indian scheme set against other countries'.
- The principle of 'Separation of Powers' is a key feature of the American Constitution. In this context, compare how the Indian Constitution's functional separation of powers distinguishes itself from the US system. What are the advantages of a check and balance system over a rigid Separation of Powers?10 answers
- Compare the powers of the head of state in India and the UK. How do their roles reflect the constitutional principles of their respective systems?7 answers
- Both India and the USA adhere to democratic principles but their electoral systems exhibit significant differences. What are the key differences in electoral practices between the two countries?6 answers
- Executive accountability to the legislature through Parliamentary Committees has been the hallmark of the Indian political system. Comment.6 answers
- 'Unique blend of flexibility and rigidity distinguish Indian constitution from that of the US constitution.' Discuss.5 answers