GS2
Judicial activism is an assertive and proactive role played by the judiciary to fill the vacuum created by other organs of the state. Discuss with examples, while highlighting the potential tensions it creates.
Answered by 1 topper
Syllabus: Separation of powers between various organs dispute redressal mechanisms and institutions.
How toppers approached it
From the one answer · about 260 words.
Opening
- A definition1 of 1
Body
- Points and prose1 of 1
Close
- A way forward1 of 1
The toppers’ answers
More on Separation of Powers
Friction and redressal between the legislature, executive and judiciary.
- The rule of law and judicial review are interdependent, as one cannot truly exist without the other. In this context can judicial review be considered the most important aspect among those that constitute the basic structure of the Constitution?10 answers
- The principle of 'Separation of Powers' is a key feature of the American Constitution. In this context, compare how the Indian Constitution's functional separation of powers distinguishes itself from the US system. What are the advantages of a check and balance system over a rigid Separation of Powers?10 answers
- In the context of persistent legislative dysfunction in India, analyze the evolving role of judicial activism in shaping public policy and governance. Using examples from landmark court cases, evaluate the effectiveness of judicial interventions in addressing governance gaps and safeguarding citizens' rights.9 answers
- What is the significance of the Leader of Opposition in the Indian parliamentary system? How does the role of the opposition contribute to the checks and balances in a democracy?7 answers
- "Supremacy of the constitution requires all ordinary laws to conform to the constitutional law." Discuss the statement with reference to judicial review in India.5 answers