Raghav JhunjhunwalaAIR 4 · CSE 2025 · 260 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
India is referred to as a compendium of 'regional cultures and interests' coexisting as a nation state. The changing expression of regional identities confirm the same.
Body · points
Traditional Aim for cultural expression
(1) Linguistic: Ex: Demand for Andhra Pradesh
(2) Religious Aspirations Ex: Punjab
(3) Unique geographical needs Ex: Uttarakhand (out of UP)
(4) Catering Tribal Interests Jharkhand & Chattisgarh
(5) Suprastate regionalism depicting shared culture Ex: Dravidian movement
(6) Intra state cultural demands Ex: Mithilanchal (Bihar)
Evolution of demands towards organized assertion of Autonomy
(1) Linguistic (Ex: Supra state nationalism in south)
(2) NER : Nagaland's demands of 'Greater Nagalim'
(3) Ladakh's demand for 6th schedule & Autonomy.
(4) Federal demands for autonomy in matters of Fiscal and Administrative discretion, etc.
But, along with Autonomy demands, the traditional aim for cultural expression still remains relevant.
Implication for national cohesion
(1) Regionalism per say is not problematic.
(2) The cause and manner in which demands are raised matters more.
(3) If genuine demands are recognized → national Integrity Ex: Andhra formation
(4) However, if demands are influenced by narrow and malicious perceptions of separation → must be suppressed.
(5) Autonmy demands is being catered by govt in various forms
a) [Ladakh] : local reservation and Special package.
b) [Financial] Autonomy by south states → Increased vertical devolution by finance commission
(6) Promotion of local governance 73rd & 74th Amendments.
Close · a way forward
Mizoram's case study is an excellent example of curbing insurgency by respect for Autonomy and development.
Constructive yet respectful dialogue via channels like NITI Aayog's Governing council is need of the hour.