Surabhi YadavAIR 14 · CSE 2025 · 261 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
Fundamental Rights originated in Bill of Rights are a guarantee to the citizen. However, they're not gift, but the right / basic necessity of being alive & live a dignified life.
Body · points
Need for Fundamental Rights
1- Ensure equality of all ↳ reduce discrimination like caste, gender. 2- Ensure a dignified / progressive life ↳ SC enhanced the scope by Right to env, privacy, food etc. 3- Ensure development in personal space ↳ Art 25-28 freedom of religion - enlighten spiritually. 4- Ensure the state does not turn into absolutist & curb individual freedom
However, their is desirability for Reasonable restriction
1- Ensure maximum (Utilitarian) freedom for all ↳ eg, Right to protest v/s Right to movement (Saheen Bagh case)
2- Maintain Unity & Integrity. ↳ upheld rights of all general will as proposed by Rousseau
3- Conflicting Rights
- eg) Art 21 - Right to Health v/s Art 25 - Freedom of Religion includes fasting
- eg) Art 14 (equality) v/s Art 25 (religious freedom) in (Sabarimala case)
4- Ensure DPSP are implemented ↳ Minerva Mills v/s UoI - SC upheld that FR can be restricted for larger welfare of society.
Certain cautions can be taken when state try to infringe such as - a) Preventive Detention - 3% convict-rate b) Restriction of on speech & expression
Close · a way forward
↳ Internet shutdowns (one of the highest in world)
State must be cautious of restrictions, they are desirable to maintain harmony but must not be used to breach rights. Supreme Court under Article 32 has been a great caretaker of FR over the years.
How toppers approach this question, and more on its topic: open the question.