Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 174 words written
1.a) Linguistic relativity principle
Opening · a definition
Linguistic relativity principle was given by [Sapir-Whorf], as their sapir-whorf hypothesis
Body · points
(1) It is based on the idea that language shapes our [world view] and our understanding of everything.
(eq) study of [Kuuk Thayyor] → Don't have words for cardinal directions of North-soith-East-West. So, [cyclical] understanding of directions.
(2) It coerces our [thought process] and unite our understanding of the world.
(eq.) [Yucatec] Maya don't have words for counting [specific] items unlike English numbers ⇒ so cannot [count] no. of items
(3) It shapes our [reality] and how we perceive things.
Eq. [John lucy] → Finnish have 2-D language whereas Swedish have 3-D. Finnish have [more accidents]
Principles to study language
- Study children's concept development
- Under experimental conditions
(eq.) Child acquisition of language shows it Hebrew is more gendered language → children acquire gender difference quicker (Alexander Guiora)
Criticisms (1) How does [bilingual] people able to think if language is coercive? (2) Extreme relativism. (3) No [empirical] methods of study
Close · a summary
[Sapir-Whorf] highlighted the importance of language in shaping our understanding of culture.