AIR 18 · CSE 2022 · GS2 · 55 pages

Siddharth Shukla: GS2 answer copy

20 answers by Siddharth Shukla, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

  1. Q13भले ही दबाव समूह शासन (गवर्नेंस) में महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाते हैं, फिर भी ऐसे समूहों के प्रतिनिधित्व और उनके वित्त-पोषण के साथ-साथ सरकार के साथ उनके संबंधों में पारदर्शिता से संबंधित अनेक मुद्दे विद्यमान हैं। विवेचना कीजिए। (उत्तर 250 शब्दों में दें)15 marks

The answers

Question 1 · 10 marks · 133 words written

It has been argued that some parts of Article 22 are not Fundamental Rights but 'Fundamental Dangers' to the citizens of India. Discuss in light of the debate on issues around the preventive detention laws in India.

Opening · a definition

Article 22 is a part of Right to freedom, it protects an individual from illegal detention and provides certain rights

Part of Article 22 considered fundamental Danger

Body · points and prose

(1) Parliament and state legislature could make laws for preventive detention → no trial for [3 months]

(2) [Preventive detention] → limited access to lawyer

(3) further on the basis of a [Board] headed by high court judge detention can be extended to more than [3 months]

(4) Laws such as [U.A.P.A] [N.S.A]

J&K and Jammu and kashmir

prevention law are made under Article 22

Diagram
- Limits good provision of A.22 - lawyer of choice - 24 hour limit to produce before magistrate - Adherence to Cr.p.c

→ prone to misuse

Diagram
- Issues with preventive Detention law - NCRB → Only 2.1% conviction under U.A.P.A - Negatively received by Human Rights Agency such as UNHRC etc

Need for such laws → National security threat

  • secession
  • terrorism → Delay in ordinary criminal justice system

Close · a summary

As the Supreme court has highlighted A.22 is a necessary evil for protecting unity and integrity of India.