Question 1(a) · 12.5 marks · 190 words written
Weber's comparative studies on Religion.
Opening
Max Weber compared the world religions by creating 'ideal types' of religions. Unlike Durkheim, he focussed on studying the well-established and complex religions of the world like Hinduism, Judaism, Confucianism, Protestantism, etc.
Body · continuous prose
He observed that Hinduism was characterized by fatalistic mindset and other-worldly ascetism. Confucianism gave a lot of credit to traditional values like family-orientation. Buddhism repudiated the collection of wealth.
All the religions lacked the required ideas for the rise of capitalism. However, this wasn't the case with Protestantism specially among the Calvinists who believed in the ideas of calling, pre-destination and this-worldly ascetism.
For the Calvinists, achievement of material success along with a sense of prudery was the norm. So, the wealth attained was not
spent but was reinvested to produce more wealth. This is the essence of capitalism.
Owing to this, whereas the rest of the world didn't give rise to capitalism despite the existence of material conditions, Protestant ethic in "affinity" with material conditions and other factors gave birth to capitalism in Western Europe.
Close
Abraham criticizes Weber to have been biased in his analysis. Like, Weber's treatment of Jews as 'pariah people' was a value judgement.