AIR 227 · CSE 2016 · Sociology I · 36 pages

Priyadarshini: Sociology I answer copy

15 answers by Priyadarshini, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

  1. Q1(a)Weber's comparative studies on Religion.12.5 marks
  2. Q1(b)Herbert Blumer's perspective on Social movement12.5 marks
  3. Q1(c)Pluralistic conception of power12.5 marks
  4. Q1(d)Secularization of societies in the modern world12.5 marks

The answers

Question 1(a) · 12.5 marks · 183 words written

Weber's comparative studies on Religion.

Opening

Weber brings to his sociology, comparative analysis within a historical approach. Central to his analysis is how religion provides individuals with the motive complex to act and organize their lives and economic production. Weber's study in the 'Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism' emphasized the idea of 'this worldly asceticism' as fundamental to the Calvinist ethic.

Body · continuous prose

In his comparison between religious values and social and economic forms of organisation, Weber studied Hinduism, Jainism and Confucianism. Both Hinduism and Confucianism are characterized by an 'other worldly asceticism' that are seen to privilege salvation above present living, acting against the development of a modern economic system of Capitalism. Jainism while regarded to be guided by the ethos of trade and commerce, and hence exchange of goods and services, is seen to lack in the modern ethos of profit making.

Close

Weber's approach though instructive is critiqued to be guided by an ethnocentric approach that fails to take account of indigenous entrepreneurship legitimized within the social organisation such as the caste system. Thus Weber's comparative approach is seen to be a form of 'arm chair theorization'.