Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 204 words written
Analyse the distinction between the two forms of solidarity discussed by Durkheim.
Opening
Emile Durkheim in his work 'Division of Labour in society' gives the answer to the question that - 'In the modern society where differentiation, specialisation & complexity exists - what binds the people together? He uses the concept of Mechanical & Organic Solidarity:
Body · points and prose
| Mechanical solidarity | Organic solidarity |
|---|---|
| → Present in simple polysegmental & complex polysegmental society. (Traditional) | Present in doubly segmental complex polysegmental society. (Modern) |
| → Based on likeness of occupation, experiences, etc. | Based on differentiation & interdependence. |
| → It binds the people together by low level of specialisation. Example: Mechanical solidarity among barbers | - Binds together in high level of specialisation & dependence on this specialisation. Eg - An IT engineer depending on a doctor |
The organic solidarity is stronger than mechanical solidarity as it arises out of need & role fulfilment.
Although it explains the functionality of Division of labour in society - it fails to explain dysfunctions (Merton) & conflicts driven by class & different ownership of modes of production (Marx).
Close · a summary
It is credited to first explain conscience collective & make sociology a science with concepts that are universally understood.